Health care: the Affordable Care Act premium tax credits
What they say
Her campaign says she led the bipartisan effort to renew and reform the Affordable Care Act tax credits and co-led a bipartisan group announcing a framework to extend premium tax credit relief.
“Jen led the bipartisan effort to renew and reform the Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits. And co-lead a bipartisan group announcing CommonGround 2025, a framework to extend premium tax credit relief for American families — a direct affordability action for working families’ healthcare costs.”
Source: Kiggans for Congress
What the record shows ·
She sponsored two bills on the subject in the 119th Congress: H.R. 5145, the Bipartisan Premium Tax Credit Extension Act, on September 4, 2025, with 30 cosponsors, 16 Democrats and 14 Republicans, whose section 2 extends the enhanced credit by one year by striking "before January 1, 2026" and inserting "before January 1, 2027"; and H.R. 6575, the CommonGround for Affordable Health Care Act, on December 10, 2025, with 38 cosponsors, 23 Democrats and 15 Republicans. Both were referred to committee and neither has been reported. On December 17, 2025 the House took two recorded votes on H.R. 6703, a health bill she did not sponsor, whose sponsor is Rep. Miller-Meeks: she voted Nay on the motion to recommit, which Rep. Underwood offered to extend the enhanced premium tax credits for three years and which failed 210 to 218 (Roll Call 348), and Yea on passage, which carried 216 to 211 (Roll Call 349). The engrossed text of H.R. 6703 carries no occurrence of "premium tax credit" and none of "36B".
Sources: Congress.gov, Congress.gov, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Congress via Congress.gov, Congress.gov
Limit: She sponsored both bills and the cosponsors of each cross party lines, so "led" and "bipartisan" hold as descriptions of these two measures. Neither has moved out of committee and neither is law. Her opponent's platform says she voted against extending the same credits, and both sentences are true of different things: the credits she sponsored a bill to extend by one year are the credits the motion to recommit would have extended by three, and on December 17, 2025 she voted against that motion and for the bill that passed instead, whose text does not mention the credits at all. Which of those facts weighs more is a judgement this card does not make, and the card reads these votes and her two bills, not the rest of her record on health care.