Tom Tiffany
Against extending the pandemic-era health insurance subsidies: “bailing out insurers again is not the solution.” Wants more choice and competition instead.
Election 2026 · Public beta
Independent, source-first accountability
Issue record
Campaign positions remain attributed. Official actions are shown separately, with narrow relationship labels and limits.
Campaign positions
Against extending the pandemic-era health insurance subsidies: “bailing out insurers again is not the solution.” Wants more choice and competition instead.
Would expand mobile outreach, addiction treatment and emergency medical services across the state.
Evidence timeline
official action
He says extending the pandemic-era health insurance subsidies would bail out insurers, and that more choice and competition would lower premiums instead. He voted for H.R. 6703, which expands association health plans, adds oversight of drug-benefit managers and funds cost-sharing payments. It passed 216-211. Three weeks later he voted against H.R. 1834, which extends the larger premium tax credits. It passed 230-196. Neither is law. Limit: His votes match what he said. Whether either bill would lower premiums is a forecast this record can't test.
See something wrong or incomplete? Report it for review.