Election 2026 · Public beta

Independent, source-first accountability

TheStatedRecordFind a race
Back to the race record

Candidate record

Juan Ciscomani

Current U.S. representative for Arizona's 6th Congressional District, in his second term. Campaign affiliation: Republican.

Voter guide

Background, stated goals, record, and money

Goals come from the campaign's own platform. Record lines are official actions.

How this guide is built

Background comes from official records, and from the campaign's own biography where the bullet says so; goals are summarized from the campaign's own platform and stay attributed; the record lines are official actions with the government source attached; money is shown as filed, with the filings it covers in the note under the table, and is not evidence of why any position was taken.

Juan Ciscomani

Background

  • The sitting member for Arizona's 6th district, in his second term; Congress.gov records House service beginning in 2023.
  • His campaign says he is the first naturalized citizen from Mexico Arizona has elected to the U.S. House, and the first in his family to go to college, at Pima Community College and the University of Arizona.
  • The House Historian lists Tucson Hispanic Chamber employment in 2011–2014 and service on Governor Doug Ducey’s staff in 2015–2022. House records list his Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs assignments.
  • Congress.gov records 63 bills and resolutions he has sponsored. One became law under its own number: H.R. 2882, which he introduced as a Udall Foundation reauthorization and which Congress used as the vehicle for its 2024 spending package; the law carries the reauthorization.

What they say they want to do

  • Lower taxes and fiscal responsibility, and more federal money back in Arizona for roads, schools and water.
  • More agents at the border.
  • Help for the district's more than 70,000 veterans.
  • Health care in rural communities, targeted medical research, and less waste and fraud.
  • A secure future for Fort Huachuca, which his campaign says he won a new military mission for.

What the official record shows

  • Voted Yea on S. 141, the Senator Elizabeth Dole veterans act, which became Public Law 118-210. He had sponsored the House version, H.R. 8371, which passed the House 389 to 9 a month earlier.
  • His Prioritizing Veterans' Survivors Act passed the House 424 to 0 and went to the Senate, where it sits in committee.
  • Voted Aye on the final House vote on H.R. 1, the 2025 reconciliation act, 218 to 214. It became Public Law 119-21 the next day.
  • Voted Yea on the final House vote on the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, 217 to 214. It became Public Law 119-75 the same day.
  • The Senate passed his Chiricahua National Park Act without changes, after the House passed it by voice vote in March. It goes to the President.

Campaign money from other committees, by type

Transfers and contributions from joint fundraising committees 8 committees$2,269,035
Leadership PACs 103 committees$504,000
Corporation PACs 118 committees$428,250
PAC - Qualified 37 committees$196,050
Trade Association PACs 42 committees$192,000
House 60 committees$144,977
Membership Organization PACs 16 committees$54,500
Labor Organization PACs 6 committees$24,000
Hybrid PAC (with Non-Contribution Account) - Qualified 3 committees$12,000
Corporation w/o capital stock PACs 2 committees$11,000
PAC - Nonqualified 3 committees$10,500
Committees the FEC records no type for 3 committees$7,000
Party committees 1 committee$5,000
Cooperative PACs 1 committee$2,000
Super PAC (Independent Expenditure-Only) 1 committee$1,500
Presidential 1 committee$0

Source: Federal Election Commission

Money from political committees in the 2025-26 cycle, through July 1, 2026 (FEC lines 11B, 11C and 12). The rows sum to 3,861,812.20 dollars. Donations from individuals, including through ActBlue or WinRed, are not counted here.

Words and record

What they say, and what the record shows

Each card gets one label from a fixed list and states its own limit.

Matches stated direction

What they say

His campaign says he supported eliminating taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security. In the September 10 debate, he also described the law as ending taxes on tips and overtime, making the expanded Child Tax Credit permanent and giving small businesses incentives to expand and invest.

What the record shows ·

He backed capped tips, overtime and senior deductions ending after 2028, plus permanent child-credit and business provisions. The law leaves Social Security benefit taxation unchanged.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign says he supported eliminating taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security. In the September 10 debate, he also described the law as ending taxes on tips and overtime, making the expanded Child Tax Credit permanent and giving small businesses incentives to expand and invest.

What the record shows ·

He voted Yea on passage of H.R. 1 on May 22, 2025 (Roll Call 145) and Aye on agreeing to the Senate's version on July 3 (Roll Call 190); it became Public Law 119-21 the next day. Its sections are titled "No tax on tips" and "No tax on overtime", but both are deductions, not exemptions. Tips: up to $25,000. Overtime: up to $12,500, or $25,000 on a joint return, and only the extra pay above the regular rate that federal wage law requires. Both shrink above $150,000 of income ($300,000 joint) and end after 2028. On Social Security, the law does not change how benefits are taxed. It adds a $6,000 deduction for each person 65 or older, shrinking above $75,000 of income ($150,000 joint), also through 2028. Section 70104 removes the expanded Child Tax Credit’s scheduled 2025 sunset, raises the maximum to $2,200 for 2025 and indexes it afterward. Section 70105 retains the qualified-business-income deduction without its old sunset. Section 70301 makes 100% bonus expensing permanent for qualifying property generally acquired after January 19, 2025; section 70306 raises section 179 expensing limits to $2.5 million, with the phaseout starting at $4 million, for property placed in service in tax years after 2024, then indexed.

Limit: He voted for the law he means, and its own section titles use his campaign's words for tips and overtime. What it gives is capped deductions that end after 2028, and the overtime one covers only the premium part of overtime pay. The Social Security part goes furthest: the law's deduction is for age, not for benefits, and the tax on benefits is unchanged. The child-credit and business provisions support his additional debate examples. Permanent means no scheduled sunset, rather than immunity from future amendment. Child-credit eligibility, income phaseouts, Social Security number rules and a separate refundable limit remain; $2,200 is a maximum, not a guaranteed payment. Business provisions apply to qualifying income or property and have transition and acquisition rules. This comparison does not establish measured household or business gains, or the separate SNAP, Medicaid and fraud assertions around the tax passage.

Matches stated direction

What they say

His campaign lists more agents at the border among the results it says he works for.

What the record shows ·

He voted for H.R. 1, which gives Customs and Border Protection $4.1 billion to hire and train more agents and officers; his own two agency bills have not become law.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign lists more agents at the border among the results it says he works for.

“His focus is on getting results for the people he represents, whether it's more agents at the border”

What the record shows ·

He voted for H.R. 1 (Roll Calls 145 and 190), now Public Law 119-21. Its section 90002 gives Customs and Border Protection $4.1 billion, available through September 2029, to hire and train more Border Patrol agents, port officers and Air and Marine agents, and $2.05 billion for hiring, retention and performance bonuses. He sponsored the CBP HiRe Act of 2024 (H.R. 7369), to give the agency more flexible hiring rules; it was referred to committee and went no further. He also sponsored the Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act (H.R. 8029), full-year 2026 funding for Homeland Security including Customs and Border Protection. It passed the House 218 to 206 on March 26, 2026, with his vote, and has not passed the Senate.

Limit: He voted for the money to hire more agents. A law that pays for hiring does not show how many agents were actually added, and his vote was on the whole act, not this section alone. His own two bills on the agency's staff and funding have not become law.

Matches stated record claim

What they say

His campaign says he has led efforts to expand veterans' education benefits.

What the record shows ·

He sponsored the House version of the Dole veterans act; the Senate's matching bill became law in January 2025, adding a VA tech training program and ending the Fry Scholarship time limit.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign says he has led efforts to expand veterans' education benefits.

“He has also led to expand veteran education benefits”

What the record shows ·

He sponsored H.R. 8371, the House's Senator Elizabeth Dole veterans act, which passed the House 389 to 9 on November 18, 2024 (Roll Call 466). The Senate put the same package into its own bill, S. 141, which the House passed 382 to 12 on December 16 with his Yea (Roll Call 504); it became Public Law 118-210 on January 2, 2025. All 75 of the law's section titles match his House bill, one with a one-word change. Its education sections set up a VA high-technology training program for up to 4,000 veterans a year, for courses that start by September 30, 2027 (section 212), pay the full housing stipend in a final semester (section 208), and end the time limit on the Fry Scholarship for surviving spouses (section 202). His earlier VET-TEC Authorization Act (H.R. 1669) would have run a larger program, up to 6,000 a year through fiscal 2028; it passed the House 409 to 9 in May 2023 and stopped in the Senate. His VETS Opportunity Act (H.R. 1458), on GI Bill repayments and which independent study programs the benefits cover, passed the House by voice vote in February 2026 and awaits the Senate.

Limit: The law was enacted under the Senate's bill number, sponsored by Senator Moran, but its section titles match the House bill he sponsored. The committee chairman, Mike Bost, managed it on the floor, so how much of the drafting was his is not shown.

Matches stated direction

What they say

His campaign says he worked to help veterans own homes, and to make sure veterans' surviving families get the benefits they were promised.

What the record shows ·

His survivors bill passed the House but not the Senate; the one home-loan change that became law covers Native American veterans on trust land.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign says he worked to help veterans own homes, and to make sure veterans' surviving families get the benefits they were promised.

“expand opportunities for military veterans to achieve the dream of homeownership”

What the record shows ·

His Prioritizing Veterans' Survivors Act, which moves the VA's Office of Survivors Assistance into the Secretary's office, passed the House by voice vote in September 2024 (H.R. 7100) and 424 to 0 in April 2025 (H.R. 1228, Roll Call 99). It has not passed the Senate. The Dole act he sponsored in the House, now Public Law 118-210, rewrites the VA's direct home loan program for Native American veterans (section 231) and ends the time limit on the Fry Scholarship for surviving spouses (section 202). He cosponsored the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act in 2024 (H.R. 8647), which did not pass, and two VA home loan bills in 2026 (H.R. 8532 and H.R. 9404), both in committee.

Limit: His survivors bill has not become law. The home-loan change that did is for Native American veterans on trust land, a small group, and the home-loan bills he cosponsored have not passed. The record shows the direction he claims, not a broad expansion of home ownership.

Matches stated direction

What they say

His campaign says he supported the largest investment in cancer research in American history.

What the record shows ·

He backed $7.35 billion for NCI in 2026, a nominal high in its table back to 1976, $32 million above 2023 with Moonshot funds. Largest-ever cancer investment is not shown.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign says he supported the largest investment in cancer research in American history.

“Juan supported the largest investment in cancer research in American history”

What the record shows ·

He voted Yea on passage of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 on January 22, 2026 (Roll Call 45, 341 to 88) and on agreeing to the Senate's changes on February 3 (Roll Call 53, 217 to 214); it became Public Law 119-75. It gives the National Cancer Institute $7,352,159,000. The 2024 spending law gave it $7,224,159,000 and the 2023 law $7,104,159,000. The institute's own budget table, which goes back to 1976, shows fiscal 2026 as its largest year. The next largest is fiscal 2023, $7,320,159,000 once $216,000,000 of Cancer Moonshot money is counted.

Limit: NCI's table covers one institute, is not adjusted for inflation, and puts 2026 $32 million above 2023, so "largest in American history" is not shown. How much of NIH's Cures Act money reached cancer research after 2023 is not settled, and his vote was on the whole spending law, not this line.

Matches stated record claim

What they say

His campaign says he secured more than $60 million for Southern Arizona community projects in his first three years. In the September 10 debate, he described directing funding to hospital emergency rooms and renovations, and to fire, police and other first responders.

What the record shows ·

Lists name him on 28 projects worth $60.87 million, including hospitals and first responders; $33.9 million came after his third year. Appropriations do not show completed work.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign says he secured more than $60 million for Southern Arizona community projects in his first three years. In the September 10 debate, he described directing funding to hospital emergency rooms and renovations, and to fire, police and other first responders.

What the record shows ·

Community project money is listed by project, amount and requesting member in the statements filed with each spending law, not in the laws themselves. The fiscal 2024 statements name him as House requester of 13 projects, $26,633,927 in all. The fiscal 2026 statements name him on 15 more, $34,239,522, including $2,000,000 for the Bisbee-Douglas International Airport, which his campaign names. Together that is 28 projects and $60,873,449. Arizona's senators also requested 17 of them. Fiscal 2025 was funded by a full-year stopgap with no new projects. The final FY2024 Agriculture table includes $859,000 for Northern Cochise Community Hospital improvements, requested by Ciscomani and Senator Kelly, and $2 million for Pima’s multipurpose building. His office’s project memo describes structural upgrades to the hospital’s main entrance and Emergency Department, and a fire station and community-use facility in Pima. The already-counted first-responder rows include Pima County radio replacement and Marana crime-scene scanning in FY2024, and Sahuarita police radios and Tucson police vehicles in FY2026.

Limit: The total counts every project that names him as House requester, including those the senators also asked for. $33,899,473 of it came in two laws signed in late January and early February 2026, weeks after his third year ended, from requests made in 2025. The matching record here is the qualified appropriated total and these named funding examples. They are not added to the $60,873,449 total again. The hospital and Pima purpose details are his office’s account linked to final appropriation rows. They do not establish every hospital referent, payment, completed renovations, better capacity or faster first-responder service.

Matches stated record claim

What they say

His campaign says he works to bring tax dollars back to Arizona for things like roads, schools and water infrastructure.

What the record shows ·

Spending laws in 2024 and 2026 list him as House requester of eight water projects totaling about $11.8 million; the lists show money set aside, not work done.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His campaign says he works to bring tax dollars back to Arizona for things like roads, schools and water infrastructure.

“bringing more of our tax dollars back to Arizona to invest in things that matter – like roads, schools and water infrastructure”

What the record shows ·

The project lists filed with the spending laws name him as House requester of eight water projects, $11,786,786 in all. In the 2024 law (Public Law 118-42, signed March 9, 2024): $1,250,000 to expand Tucson Water's recharge, $2,250,000 for a Tucson Water well and PFAS removal plant, $1,823,000 for a CAIDD drought-resiliency water project, and $274,000 from the rural water and wastewater grant account for drainage work in Duncan. In the 2026 law (Public Law 119-74, signed January 23, 2026): $989,786 for Tombstone's water reclamation plant, $1,200,000 for a Graham County water line, and $1,750,000 for PFAS treatment and $2,250,000 for source-water work in Marana.

Limit: These eight are among the 28 projects on his community-projects card. Sen. Sinema also asked for all four 2024 projects and Sen. Kelly for three. The lists show money set aside, not work done.

Matches stated direction

What they say

His House office says the 2026 defense bill secured wins for the district, starting with language for Fort Huachuca's Electronic Proving Ground.

What the record shows ·

He voted for the 2026 defense law, which bars the Army from cutting its electronic warfare testing until it reports to Congress but does not name the Electronic Proving Ground.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His House office says the 2026 defense bill secured wins for the district, starting with language for Fort Huachuca's Electronic Proving Ground.

“This year’s NDAA secures several major wins for our district — including critical language for the Electronic Proving Ground (EPG)”

What the record shows ·

He voted Aye when the House passed its 2026 defense bill, H.R. 3838, 231 to 196 on September 10, 2025 (Roll Call 262), and Yea on the final version, S. 1071, which passed the House 312 to 112 on December 10 (Roll Call 320). It became Public Law 119-60 on December 18, 2025. Section 1546 bars the Army from closing, merging or cutting back its electronic warfare testing until it reports to Congress. Section 1047 lets the Air Force give five retired T-37B trainers to the Arizona Aviation Historical Group. Section 2608 lets it acquire 10 acres for an earlier project at Tucson International Airport.

Limit: The law does not name the Electronic Proving Ground, and it does not show who asked for each section. His votes were on the whole bill.

Matches stated direction

What they say

His House office quotes him saying members of Congress should not get rich from their position in office.

What the record shows ·

He cosponsored and voted for a 2026 House bill barring members and their families from buying most stocks, which also required voter photo ID; a Senate vote to take it up failed.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

His House office quotes him saying members of Congress should not get rich from their position in office.

“Members of Congress should not be getting rich because of their position in public office”

What the record shows ·

He is an original cosponsor of the Stop Insider Trading Act (H.R. 7008), introduced January 12, 2026; Rep. Bryan Steil is the sponsor. As the House passed it, it bars members, their spouses and dependent children from buying stock in public companies, with exceptions such as diversified funds, and requires public notice 7 to 14 days before a sale. The same version requires photo ID to vote in federal elections. The House passed it 232 to 198 on July 22, 2026 (Roll Call 280), with his Yea. On September 30 a Senate vote to take it up failed, 53 to 47.

Limit: It has not become law. His vote also covered the photo ID rule in the same bill.

Matches stated record claim

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections Commission debate, Ciscomani said he was among the Republicans who voted to override a presidential veto of a water bill, describing it as authorizing new infrastructure in the western United States.

What the record shows ·

He voted Yea on the January 2026 H.R. 131 override. It was a Colorado conduit repayment bill, and the 248-177 vote failed to reach two-thirds.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections Commission debate, Ciscomani said he was among the Republicans who voted to override a presidential veto of a water bill, describing it as authorizing new infrastructure in the western United States.

What the record shows ·

The Clerk records Ciscomani voting Yea on January 8, 2026 to pass H.R. 131 over the President's veto (Roll Call 9). He was one of 35 Republican Yeas. The tally was 248-177, with one Present; it failed to reach the required two-thirds. The Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act changed repayment terms for a Colorado water conduit, including a longer repayment period and reduced simple interest for hardship. It had passed both chambers by voice vote before the December 29 veto and has not become law.

Limit: This confirms a vote to override, not a successful override. The bill addressed repayment for a Colorado conduit, not a new Arizona water project. The vote does not establish his claimed personal courage or a complete record of independence from his party. His introductory infrastructure description is broader than the enrolled bill’s mechanism: repayment changes for an already authorized project. His full answer claimed a vote to override, rather than that the override succeeded.

Matches stated direction

What they say

In the September 10 AZ-06 debate, Ciscomani described supporting legislation to lengthen guest-worker work permits beyond one year.

What the record shows ·

He originally cosponsored a 2023 bill proposing three-year H-2A and H-2B certifications and petitions; it did not become law, and his debate did not name its intended bill.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 AZ-06 debate, Ciscomani described supporting legislation to lengthen guest-worker work permits beyond one year.

What the record shows ·

Ciscomani was an original cosponsor of the HIRE Act, H.R. 4708, on July 18, 2023; Rep. Tony Gonzales introduced it. Section 2 proposed three-year validity for H-2A agricultural and H-2B nonagricultural labor certifications and petitions. Section 3 would allow an in-person interview to be waived for a worker renewing either status within four years after it expired. The complete action list records introduction and referral to two House committees on July 18, 2023. The proposal did not pass or become law in the 118th Congress.

Limit: The debate did not name a bill. This verifies a related action supporting longer validity, not the identity of the unnamed proposal. His formal role was original cosponsor. Three-year certifications and petitions would not guarantee that every worker could return or remain for three years; the interview waiver would be discretionary. This earlier proposal is not a current entitlement or an enacted permit extension.

Matches stated record claim

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections debate, Ciscomani said the 2025 reconciliation law brought $167 million for rural health care.

What the record shows ·

CMS awarded Arizona about $167 million for FY2026 under the program created by the law he voted for; the award does not establish local spending or improved care.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections debate, Ciscomani said the 2025 reconciliation law brought $167 million for rural health care.

What the record shows ·

Ciscomani voted Aye on July 3, 2025, to agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 1 (Roll Call 190); the House agreed, 218 to 214. The bill became Public Law 119-21 on July 4. Section 71401 created the Rural Health Transformation Program with $10 billion for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2030. On December 29, 2025, CMS announced Arizona’s FY2026 award of $166,988,956. The actual notice to Arizona’s Medicaid agency records $166,988,955.92, which rounds to $167 million. Its February 24, 2026 budget revision retains that amount.

Limit: The $167 million is Arizona’s first-year federal award, not the national program’s total or money already spent by local providers. CMS awarded it after reviewing the state’s plan; his recorded action is a vote for the whole law. This award alone does not establish the law’s net effect on Medicaid or other health funding, or demonstrate improved care. The February revision records $0 in newly obligated funds; it is not a second $167 million award or a promise of the same Arizona amount each year.

Not comparable yet

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections debate, Ciscomani said he acted on millions in VA executive bonuses and made sure that money was going to veterans.

What the record shows ·

Written hearing questions and a recovery bill still in committee show VA bonus oversight. They do not establish how much his actions recovered or that it reached veterans.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections debate, Ciscomani said he acted on millions in VA executive bonuses and made sure that money was going to veterans.

What the record shows ·

The June 4, 2024 hearing discusses $10.8 million in improper critical-skill incentive payments to senior VA executives. The House Veterans’ Affairs hearing record for June 4, 2024 prints Ciscomani’s written questions to VA and its inspector general about executive incentive repayments, accountability and future controls. On February 2, 2026 he was an original cosponsor of H.R. 7319, introduced by Rep. Keith Self. It would extend VA’s authority to recoup certain bonuses and relocation expenses from former employees, with debt collection permitted after an upheld order remains unpaid for 180 days. The complete action list ends with a subcommittee referral on March 2, 2026; the bill has not passed or become law. The inspector general’s witness said it had heard that a significant amount was recouped, while explicitly stating that recoupment was outside its audit scope. VA testimony describes corrective action beginning in 2023.

Limit: This supports documented oversight and support for recovery legislation. It does not establish how much his actions recovered, that he personally caused recoupment, or that recovered money was redirected to veterans. The broader claimed result remains unverified by these sources. The witness’s reported recoupment status is not an audited recovery amount. The 2024 written questions cannot establish the cause of corrective action begun in 2023. The proposed bill provides no veteran allocation or recovered amount.

Not comparable yet

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections debate, Ciscomani said he got involved after rumors of closure and helped keep the Sierra Vista Vet Center open.

What the record shows ·

His letter concerns an already closed access point and an approved replacement; VA lists a current outstation, but these records do not prove he kept the earlier site open.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 Clean Elections debate, Ciscomani said he got involved after rumors of closure and helped keep the Sierra Vista Vet Center open.

What the record shows ·

Ciscomani’s signed July 20, 2023 letter asked VA about veterans’ counseling in Sierra Vista. It described the Community Access Point at the Warrior Healing Center as closed and a transition to a Vet Center Outstation as already approved, then requested answers about the closure, access and opening timetable. VA’s December 1, 2023 announcement placed the new outstation in the leasing phase. Its current status page says the Sierra Vista outstation provides services in person and virtually Monday through Friday and records a community dedication on October 2, 2025.

Limit: The letter documents advocacy, and VA confirms a current outstation. These sources do not establish uninterrupted operation of the earlier access point or that his intervention caused VA’s approval or opening. The current page gives a dedication date, not the date services first began. The signed letter already describes replacement approval, so it does not show that his later request caused that earlier approval. The broader keep-open outcome remains unresolved; no adverse finding is made.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described 2026 as his twentieth year as a United States citizen.

What the record shows

His office consistently places citizenship in September 2006. These dated accounts support the chronology as his own account; an independent naturalization record was not inspected.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described 2026 as his twentieth year as a United States citizen.

What the record shows

His September 2025 House-office newsletter says he became a citizen on September 18, 2006 and was celebrating nineteen years. An August 2026 office report again describes him recounting citizenship twenty years earlier. These are consistent dated public accounts from his own office.

Why there is no assessment here

The 2006 date is a consistent first-person official-office account. Independent documentary corroboration of the naturalization date is not established by these sources.

Limit: The office publications independently establish what he has publicly said, rather than the naturalization date itself. No certificate or adjudicative record was inspected. September 10 precedes September 18, but his debate wording referred to the anniversary year.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he had ranked as Arizona’s most bipartisan member every year he had been in office.

What the record shows

The published 2023 House index places him ahead of Arizona’s other House members. That one annual, House-only table does not verify every year or a House-and-Senate comparison.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he had ranked as Arizona’s most bipartisan member every year he had been in office.

What the record shows

The complete 2023 Lugar Center–McCourt House index places Ciscomani 45th overall, with a score of 0.74924. He is ahead of all eight other Arizona House members in that table; the next Arizona member is Greg Stanton, 49th, at 0.62369. This establishes the Arizona House comparison for that published year.

Why there is no assessment here

The 2023 Arizona House result is supported. The every-year claim and a comparison across both chambers remain unverified.

Limit: The retrieved annual series does not establish the same result for 2024, 2025 and the 2026 debate date, or an Arizona comparison combining House and Senate members. A later Bridge grade and a legislative-effectiveness ranking use different methods and cannot fill those gaps. None of these limits disproves an unlocated annual ranking.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described serving on Appropriations and said he was the only member in Congress serving on both Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs.

What the record shows

Current House rosters overlap only at Ciscomani; Moran held both Senate counterparts in 2025. The intended chamber scope and exact debate-date uniqueness remain unsettled.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described serving on Appropriations and said he was the only member in Congress serving on both Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs.

What the record shows

The Clerk and House Historian document his service on both House committees. The complete House membership lists retrieved October 7 have one shared member: Ciscomani. The Senate has separate committees; Senator Jerry Moran’s January 7, 2025 assignment announcement lists him on Senate Appropriations and Senate Veterans’ Affairs.

Why there is no assessment here

His two House assignments are documented. Current House-only uniqueness does not settle the debate’s chamber ambiguity or precise debate-date roster continuity.

Limit: Membership on both House committees is supported. The current House intersection is a House-only finding, not an all-Congress one. Native captions use Congress, while the answer discusses his own House assignments; the intended chamber reference and exact September 10 roster continuity are not settled. These records establish committee roles, not delivery of every funding claim.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he opposed a proposed Medicaid expansion matching-rate cut, held his vote until it was removed and then supported the bill. He said the proposal would have taken the expansion population off Arizona’s books and described Arizona as having expanded more aggressively than any other state.

What the record shows

A letter and office account document his opposition, but the rejected proposal, withheld-vote sequence and effect on Arizona beneficiaries remain unverified.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he opposed a proposed Medicaid expansion matching-rate cut, held his vote until it was removed and then supported the bill. He said the proposal would have taken the expansion population off Arizona’s books and described Arizona as having expanded more aggressively than any other state.

What the record shows

Ciscomani signed the April 14, 2025 joint letter opposing reductions in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations. His May newsletter specifically reports pushing against changes to federal matching rates, per-capita caps and provider taxes during House negotiations. The Clerk records his Yea on House passage of H.R. 1 in May and Aye on final House concurrence in July. The resulting law changes other Medicaid financing rules, including emergency-care matching and a separate expansion incentive in sections 71110 and 71114.

Why there is no assessment here

The public record supports opposition and eventual support for H.R. 1. It does not establish the exact withheld-vote sequence, the rejected proposal’s full Arizona consequence or the comparative expansion claim.

Limit: Public advocacy and his eventual votes are documented. The exact rejected proposal, its withdrawal sequence, a withheld vote and private White House discussions are not independently reconstructed. The hypothetical end of expansion eligibility depends on that unidentified proposal and the defined group covered by Arizona’s statutory trigger; it is not established for every beneficiary. The more-aggressive-than-every-state comparison remains unverified. Opposition to one proposed cut does not show that every matching-rate or Medicaid-financing change was removed.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he had worked with both the Biden and Trump administrations and brought both administrations’ VA secretaries to Southern Arizona. He also described the local VA as a national example.

What the record shows

His office documents visits with VA secretaries in both administrations; the local VA’s claimed nationwide standing remains unverified.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he had worked with both the Biden and Trump administrations and brought both administrations’ VA secretaries to Southern Arizona. He also described the local VA as a national example.

What the record shows

An August 2024 House-office newsletter reports hosting Biden’s VA Secretary Denis McDonough at Tucson VA and discussing local services. His April 29, 2025 release documents a Tucson VA tour and veteran-advisory meeting with Trump’s VA Secretary Doug Collins. These are named public examples of work with executive officials from both administrations.

Why there is no assessment here

Named engagement with both administrations is documented. The broader national-model description and causal credit for surrounding funding and policy results are not settled by visit reports.

Limit: The visits are dated office reports, not independently inspected visitor logs. They support the modest engagement claim but do not establish that his contacts caused every allocation or policy outcome. A formal nationwide ranking or comparative performance measure supporting the local-VA-as-national-example description was not identified.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said VA funding had increased every year he had been in office and that only Homeland Security, Veterans and Defense had that annual-increase record.

What the record shows

Aggregate VA totals rise from FY2023 to FY2026, while discretionary funding does not rise each year; the broader comparison with other funding areas remains unverified.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said VA funding had increased every year he had been in office and that only Homeland Security, Veterans and Defense had that annual-increase record.

What the record shows

VA’s historical table reports Total VA funding of $308.8 billion in FY2023, $335.2 billion in FY2024, $401.3 billion in FY2025 and $453.3 billion in FY2026. The Clerk records his Yea on the FY2024 concurrence, FY2025 full-year funding and FY2026 package votes (2024 roll 64; 2025 rolls 70 and 285). These are later packages; FY2023 supplies the baseline. The same VA table’s discretionary row is $135.0 billion, $135.0 billion, $129.2 billion and $133.4 billion.

Why there is no assessment here

The aggregate FY2023–FY2026 trend and later package votes are documented. The only-three-areas comparison remains unverified because its funding measure and complete cross-government comparison are undefined.

Limit: The rise is in aggregate nominal funding, not every account or the discretionary row alone. The table combines mandatory and discretionary funding with medical collections and the transformational fund; it excludes specified emergency supplements and rounds amounts. FY2027 is a request and is excluded. The checked votes do not imply he enacted the pre-service FY2023 baseline or solely caused increases. No consistent all-area denominator was established for the only-three-areas assertion, and these totals do not establish services delivered or inflation-adjusted gains.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said his office had returned more than $8 million in benefits owed to veterans after problems with VA and other government bureaucracy.

What the record shows

His office reported over $9 million for veteran constituents before the debate; the multi-agency aggregate is self-reported and does not establish audited payments.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said his office had returned more than $8 million in benefits owed to veterans after problems with VA and other government bureaucracy.

What the record shows

His May 4, 2026 office release reports over $7.5 million returned to veterans. The August 27 release reports over $9 million, before the debate, and identifies owed funds across VA, the IRS, Social Security and other federal agencies. An earlier first-100-days report separately lists $8.9 million for all constituents and $3.65 million for veterans, so the whole-office total is not substituted for veteran casework.

Why there is no assessment here

The office publicly reported a veteran-specific total above the debate’s $8 million threshold beforehand. Independent payment reconciliation and the precise share recovered through VA remain unverified.

Limit: The dated office aggregate supports the threshold as an attributable office report. It is not an independent beneficiary-payment audit, a VA-only total, or proof of the exact deduplicated amounts and personal causal contribution in every case. No private benefits, medical or family files were inspected.

Matches stated record claim

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described earlier work at a Hispanic chamber of commerce and the governor’s office.

What the record shows

The House Historian lists Tucson Hispanic Chamber roles in 2011–2014 and employment in Governor Doug Ducey’s office in 2015–2022.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described earlier work at a Hispanic chamber of commerce and the governor’s office.

What the record shows

The House Historian lists him as membership director and vice president of outreach for the Tucson Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in 2011–2014, and on the staff of Arizona Governor Doug Ducey in 2015–2022.

Limit: This confirms the two employment affiliations he named. The biography does not establish the surrounding claims about lifelong accessibility, a retained cellphone number or everyone’s ability to reach his office.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described town halls at companies, telephone town halls and mobile office hours across the district, and said everyone could reach his office.

What the record shows

An office report describes a held telephone town hall; specific workplace events, mobile hours and everyone’s ability to reach the office remain unverified.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described town halls at companies, telephone town halls and mobile office hours across the district, and said everyone could reach his office.

What the record shows

A 2024 office newsletter retrospectively describes a healthcare telephone town hall with Julia Strange from Tucson Medical Center, with a linked recording. The Tucson Association of Realtors separately advertised an August 27, 2026 town hall with him. The host’s listing is an announcement, rather than proof the event was held.

Why there is no assessment here

The telephone event is documented. The workplace and mobile-hours portions, and universal accessibility, remain source-limited.

Limit: A specific telephone town hall is documented as an office-reported held event. Specific workplace occurrence and mobile-office-hours examples are not established by these reviewed captures. Closed registration does not prove occurrence. His assertion that everyone can reach the office and the broader accessibility comparison are not measured here; no numerical event total is inferred.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described service on intelligence committees and said intelligence sharing with Mexico was greater than ever before.

What the record shows

His roles include national-security appropriations, not the current House Intelligence roster. His intended committees, debate-date roles and record Mexico sharing remain unsettled.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described service on intelligence committees and said intelligence sharing with Mexico was greater than ever before.

What the record shows

The Clerk and his office list Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs. His appropriations subcommittees include Homeland Security and National Security, Department of State, and Related Agencies. The current formal House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence roster does not list him. These are different committee structures.

Why there is no assessment here

Formal committee structures are documented, but the intended intelligence-committee reference and historical Mexico-sharing superlative remain unresolved. No classified material is requested or inferred.

Limit: The plural intelligence-committees wording may refer informally to funding oversight or briefings; formal roster records do not resolve his intended meaning. They do not show he never receives intelligence briefings or lacks access. A defined public measure and consistent historical series establishing more sharing with Mexico than ever before were not identified. Current rosters also do not reconstruct every assignment at the September 10 debate date.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he had worked toward keeping cross-border tourism fees from applying to members of the nation in both the United States and Mexico.

What the record shows

He cosponsored a temporary tribal ceremonial parole proposal with a conditional $200 fee; it is not law or a blanket zero-fee tourism exemption.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he had worked toward keeping cross-border tourism fees from applying to members of the nation in both the United States and Mexico.

What the record shows

Ciscomani was an original cosponsor of Rep. Andy Biggs’s H.R. 5904 on November 4, 2025. Its introduced text would create a two-year conditional exception for parole into the United States for sacred tribal or religious ceremonies, cultural exchange or celebrations. It requires a preliminary criminal background check, a written request from a federally recognized tribe with trust land at or near the Southwest border, and enrollment in that tribe’s cultural-participant program. Under those conditions, the applicant would pay $200 in place of the applicable parole fee. The bill’s action record shows introduction and committee referral, not enactment.

Why there is no assessment here

The targeted introduced proposal is documented. The intended tourism fee and any universal or enacted tribal exemption remain unverified.

Limit: This is concrete work toward targeted fee relief. It does not establish zero fees, a blanket exemption for every tribal member on both sides of the border or relief from every tourism charge. The debate does not identify which fee he meant. Parole admission, citizenship status and the bill’s temporary conditions matter; the separate I-94 land-border charge is not the charge this text amends.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described leading the Arizona-Mexico Commission under the governor with a focus on expanding trade, calling trade expansion its sole focus and Mexico Arizona’s number-one trading partner.

What the record shows

A 2019 review calls him vice-chair and carries his trade advocacy; an archived governor page says director. Title continuity, an exclusively trade remit and partner rank are unsettled.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani described leading the Arizona-Mexico Commission under the governor with a focus on expanding trade, calling trade expansion its sole focus and Mexico Arizona’s number-one trading partner.

What the record shows

A March 2019 trade policy review identifies Ciscomani as commission vice-chair and includes his signed advocacy for the USMCA. An archived governor page separately describes him as the commission’s director. These institutional records support leadership and trade advocacy. The commission’s current mission also includes quality of life, networking and information.

Why there is no assessment here

Institutional records support leadership and trade focus. Exact title continuity, literal sole-focus scope and the debate-date largest-trading-partner ranking remain source-limited.

Limit: The records do not reconstruct an exact continuous title chronology or establish that every aspect of his role or the commission’s work had an exclusively trade remit. This is a role-and-purpose claim, not a claimed numerical increase personally achieved. A directly reviewed dated trade dataset supporting the neighboring number-one-partner assertion was not established in this audit; an inaccessible response is not ranking proof.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said Arizona advanced a water proposal through his White House relationship and that it had been accepted for the next two years, buying time for a longer-term solution.

What the record shows

Interior adopted 2027–2028 operating guidelines; the record does not establish his personal causal role, and Arizona’s share depends on implementing agreements.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said Arizona advanced a water proposal through his White House relationship and that it had been accepted for the next two years, buying time for a longer-term solution.

What the record shows

Interior announced final operating guidelines for 2027 and 2028 on August 21, 2026 within a 2027–2036 decision framework. The guidelines incorporate concepts from Upper and Lower Basin proposals and Basin tribes. They provide for 1.25 million acre-feet in annual Lower Basin delivery reductions in each of those two years; the stated Arizona share is 760,000 acre-feet if the Lower Basin implementing agreement is in place.

Why there is no assessment here

Federal adoption for two operating years is supported. The exact state proposal and claimed personal route to acceptance remain unverified.

Limit: The two-year federal approach is documented, rather than a long-term settlement or an elimination of Arizona cuts. The public decision does not identify the exact Arizona proposal he meant or independently establish his White House relationship as the causal route. It credits multiple contributors; the debate does not claim Arizona exclusively supplied every provision. Conditional state shares must not be described as unconditional.

No assessment

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he supported mail voting and had advocated for Arizona’s system. In the surrounding answer, he described Arizona as better at it than every other state and as using it longer than most states, while also supporting in-person voting.

What the record shows

He cosponsored mail-ballot tracking proposals that did not become law; broader comparisons of Arizona’s performance and history remain unverified.

Read the full check

Quotes, full record and limits

What they say

In the September 10 debate, Ciscomani said he supported mail voting and had advocated for Arizona’s system. In the surrounding answer, he described Arizona as better at it than every other state and as using it longer than most states, while also supporting in-person voting.

What the record shows

He was an original cosponsor of the Vote by Mail Tracking Act in the 118th Congress (H.R. 5658) and again on January 27, 2026 in the 119th (H.R. 7265). The current introduced text would require postal tracking barcodes, envelope-design and machineability standards and an Election Mail logo, with a federal write-in absentee ballot exception. The earlier bill passed the House without becoming law; the current bill reached a committee order to report in February 2026.

Why there is no assessment here

Mail-ballot tracking advocacy is documented. The broad comparative claims about Arizona’s performance and duration remain unverified.

Limit: These are concrete actions supporting mail-ballot tracking. They do not establish an enacted change, endorsement of every Arizona procedure, opposition to every possible restriction or a universal mail-only system. The comparative better-than-every-state and longer-than-most-state descriptions were not independently established.

Issues in this record

Follow the evidence by issue.

Costs and taxesHealth careThe border and immigrationVeteransWater, energy and the environmentNational securityGovernment and elections

Evidence timeline

Dated records, with sources attached.

  1. race event

    Chiricahua National Park Act clears Congress

    The Senate passed Ciscomani's bill to make Chiricahua National Monument a national park, without changes. It goes to the President.

  2. race event

    Official candidate list

    Pima County's official general-election candidate list, updated September 9, 2026, prints four candidates for District 6. Its write-in list names one certified write-in, Michael Dorland.

  3. finance

    FEC filing snapshot

    Pre-Primary 2026, principal campaign committee CISCOMANI FOR CONGRESS.

  4. race event

    The 2026 spending law is signed

    The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 became Public Law 119-75. Ciscomani voted for it on passage and on the final vote.

  5. race event

    Ciscomani is an original cosponsor of VA recovery proposal

    Keith Self introduced H.R. 7319 with Ciscomani as an original cosponsor. The bill proposes recovery authority concerning former VA employees; it has not passed or become law.

  6. race event

    Ciscomani votes to override a water-bill veto

    Ciscomani voted Yea on H.R. 131, the Colorado conduit repayment bill. The 248-177 vote failed the two-thirds threshold, so the veto stood.

  7. race event

    The reconciliation act becomes law

    H.R. 1 became Public Law 119-21. Ciscomani voted for it on passage and on the final vote.

  8. race event

    The Dole veterans act becomes law

    S. 141 became Public Law 118-210. Ciscomani sponsored its House version, H.R. 8371, and voted for the final bill.

  9. race event

    Hearing record includes Ciscomani written questions on VA bonuses

    The June 4 hearing record attributes written questions about executive incentives, repayments and controls to Ciscomani. This establishes written oversight, without proving money recovered or redirected to veterans.

  10. race event

    Ciscomani asks VA about Sierra Vista counseling closure and replacement

    His signed letter describes an already closed Community Access Point and an approved transition to an outstation, then asks about access and opening plans. It does not establish continuous operation or a causal role in approval.

  11. race event

    Ciscomani joins a guest-worker validity proposal

    As an original cosponsor of the HIRE Act, backed three-year H-2A and H-2B labor certifications and petitions. The bill was referred to two House committees and did not become law.

See something wrong or incomplete? Report it for review.

Sources131 source records

How we use sources

  1. Juan Ciscomani, member recordhttps://www.congress.gov/member/juan-ciscomani/C001133

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Used for his office, district and the two terms recorded, the first beginning in 2023. It also counts 63 sponsored and 684 cosponsored items.

    official office record

    For: Current role; Background, goals, record and campaign money

  2. Home pagehttps://juanciscomani.com/

    Juan Ciscomani for Congress · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Campaign-controlled source, the site his FEC committee lists. It links his X, Instagram and Facebook accounts. Positions are attributed, not independently verified.

    candidate statement

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; The border: more agents

  3. Meet Juanhttps://juanciscomani.com/meet-juan-2026

    Juan Ciscomani for Congress · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Campaign biography. The older /meet-juan address returns 404.

    candidate statement

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Water: projects back home

  4. House Historian: Juan Ciscomani biography and committee historyhttps://history.house.gov/People/Listing/C/CISCOMANI,-Juan-(C001133)/

    U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Historian · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Substantive named biography with correct C001133 identity; the failed numeric error document is not used. Lists dated chamber and governor-office employment.

    official office record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs; Work before Congress: chamber and governor’s office

  5. Clerk: Juan Ciscomani committee assignmentshttps://clerk.house.gov/Members/C001133

    Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Current formal House assignments list Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs; intelligence-related funding responsibilities are distinct from the select intelligence committee.

    official office record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs; National security: committee roles and Mexico intelligence sharing

  6. H.R. 2882, 118th Congress, Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2882

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    He introduced it on April 26, 2023 as the Udall Foundation Reauthorization Act of 2023. Congress later used it as the vehicle for the fiscal 2024 spending package, Public Law 118-47.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money

  7. H.R. 2882, Public Law 118-47https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-118publ47

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Enacted text, approved March 23, 2024. Used for its National Cancer Institute line and for the Udall Foundation Reauthorization Act of 2024 it carries.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Health: cancer research funding

  8. Resultshttps://juanciscomani.com/results

    Juan Ciscomani for Congress · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The campaign's list of what it says he has done: veterans, taxes, community projects, Fort Huachuca, health care and cancer research. Every card on his column starts from this page or the home page.

    candidate statement

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Taxes: tips, overtime, child credit and business incentives; Veterans: education benefits; Veterans: home ownership and survivors; Health: cancer research funding; Community projects: $60 million

  9. Roll Call 504, S. 141, Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Acthttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024504

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of December 16, 2024, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On suspending the rules and passing the Senate bill; 382 to 12.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Veterans: education benefits; The Dole veterans act becomes law

  10. S. 141, Public Law 118-210https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-118publ210

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The enacted Dole Act, approved January 2, 2025. Used for sections 202, 208, 212 and 231. Section 212's high-technology program ends for programs that begin after September 30, 2027 (new 38 U.S.C. 3699C(i)). Its sponsor was Senator Moran.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Veterans: education benefits; Veterans: home ownership and survivors; The Dole veterans act becomes law

  11. H.R. 8371, 118th Congress, Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8371

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani), House passage and the House-passed text. Bost, the committee chairman, moved it on the floor. The Senate did not take it up; it passed S. 141 instead.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Veterans: education benefits; Veterans: home ownership and survivors; The Dole veterans act becomes law

  12. Roll Call 99, H.R. 1228, Prioritizing Veterans' Survivors Acthttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202599

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of April 9, 2025, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On suspending the rules and passing the bill; 424 to 0.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Veterans: home ownership and survivors

  13. H.R. 1228, 119th Congress, Prioritizing Veterans' Survivors Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1228

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani), House passage and its referral in the Senate.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Veterans: home ownership and survivors

  14. Roll Call 190, H.R. 1, on concurring in the Senate amendmenthttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025190

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of July 3, 2025, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On the motion to concur in the Senate amendment; 218 to 214.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Taxes: tips, overtime, child credit and business incentives; The border: more agents; Rural health: Arizona’s $167 million award; Medicaid: opposing a proposed matching-rate cut; The reconciliation act becomes law

  15. H.R. 1, 119th Congress, Public Law 119-21https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-119publ21

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The enacted text. Used for sections 70103 (the $6,000 deduction for people 65 and older), 70201 (tips), 70202 (overtime) and 90002 (Customs and Border Protection personnel). A search of the full text finds no change to how Social Security benefits are taxed.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Taxes: tips, overtime, child credit and business incentives; The border: more agents; Rural health: Arizona’s $167 million award; Medicaid: opposing a proposed matching-rate cut; The reconciliation act becomes law

  16. Roll Call 53, H.R. 7148, on concurring in the Senate amendmentshttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202653

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of February 3, 2026, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On the motion to concur in the Senate amendments; 217 to 214.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Health: cancer research funding; The 2026 spending law is signed

  17. H.R. 7148, Public Law 119-75, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-119publ75

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Enacted text, approved February 3, 2026. Division B is the Labor, Health and Human Services act; used for the National Cancer Institute line.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Health: cancer research funding; The 2026 spending law is signed

  18. H.R. 6380, 119th Congress, Chiricahua National Park Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6380

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani). Passed the House by voice vote on March 16, 2026 and the Senate without amendment by unanimous consent on September 30, 2026; not yet signed when read.

    official legislative record

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money; Chiricahua National Park Act clears Congress

  19. CISCOMANI FOR CONGRESS, receipts from political committeeshttps://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?committee_id=C00786194&two_year_transaction_period=2026&line_number=F3-11C

    Federal Election Commission · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Read with tools/fec-money/money.py on October 1, 2026: lines 11B (1 row), 11C (736 rows, 61 memo) and 12 (1,476 rows, 1,417 memo), each reconciled to the committee's filed totals with no difference.

    fec filing

    For: Background, goals, record and campaign money

  20. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: tax lawhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=430s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 07:10.462 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Taxes: tips, overtime, child credit and business incentives

  21. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: tax lawhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=637s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 07:10.462 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Taxes: tips, overtime, child credit and business incentives

  22. Roll Call 145, H.R. 1, on passagehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025145

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of May 22, 2025, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On passage; 215 to 214, one Present.

    official legislative record

    For: Taxes: tips, overtime, child credit and business incentives; The border: more agents; Medicaid: opposing a proposed matching-rate cut; The reconciliation act becomes law

  23. H.R. 7369, 118th Congress, CBP HiRe Act of 2024https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7369

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani). Also titled the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Hiring and Retention Act of 2024; official title 'To provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection with adequate flexibility in its employment authorities.' Referred to committee on February 15, 2024, with no further action.

    official legislative record

    For: The border: more agents

  24. H.R. 8029, 119th Congress, Pay Our Homeland Defenders Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8029

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani) and the CRS summary: full-year fiscal 2026 funding for Homeland Security, including Customs and Border Protection, after the partial shutdown that began February 14, 2026. Passed the House March 26, 2026; received in the Senate April 2.

    official legislative record

    For: The border: more agents

  25. Roll Call 104, H.R. 8029, Pay Our Homeland Defenders Acthttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026104

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of March 26, 2026, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On passage; 218 to 206.

    official legislative record

    For: The border: more agents

  26. Roll Call 466, H.R. 8371, Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Acthttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024466

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of November 18, 2024, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On suspending the rules and passing the bill as amended; 389 to 9.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: education benefits

  27. S. 141, 118th Congresshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/141

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The enacted vehicle: passed the Senate with a substitute on December 12, 2024, the House on December 16, signed January 2, 2025.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: education benefits

  28. H.R. 8371, 118th Congress, as passed by the Househttps://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-118hr8371eh

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    House-passed text. Compared with Public Law 118-210 by table of contents: all 75 section titles match, and one (section 403) differs by a single word ('to use of' in the House bill, 'to use' in the law).

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: education benefits

  29. H.R. 1669, 118th Congress, VET-TEC Authorization Act of 2023https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1669

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani), the CRS summary (up to 6,000 veterans a year through fiscal 2028) and its referral in the Senate, where it stopped.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: education benefits

  30. Roll Call 235, H.R. 1669, VET-TEC Authorization Act of 2023https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2023235

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of May 24, 2023, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On suspending the rules and passing the bill as amended; 409 to 9.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: education benefits

  31. H.R. 1458, 119th Congress, VETS Opportunity Act of 2025https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1458

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani) and the CRS summary: GI Bill repayment within 60 days, and changes to which independent study programs VA education benefits cover. Passed the House by voice vote on February 2, 2026; referred in the Senate.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: education benefits

  32. H.R. 7100, 118th Congress, Prioritizing Veterans' Survivors Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7100

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Sponsorship (Ciscomani) and passage by voice vote on September 17, 2024. The CRS summary says it moves the Office of Survivors Assistance into the Office of the Secretary.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: home ownership and survivors

  33. H.R. 8647, 118th Congress, VA Home Loan Program Reform Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8647

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    He is listed as a cosponsor. The bill was forwarded by subcommittee and went no further in that Congress.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: home ownership and survivors

  34. H.R. 8532, 119th Congress, VA Home Loan Affordability Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8532

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    He is listed as a cosponsor. Referred to committee.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: home ownership and survivors

  35. H.R. 9404, 119th Congress, VA Home Loan Navigator Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/9404

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    He is listed as a cosponsor. Referred to committee.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: home ownership and survivors

  36. Roll Call 45, H.R. 7148, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, on passagehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202645

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of January 22, 2026, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On passage; 341 to 88.

    official legislative record

    For: Health: cancer research funding; The 2026 spending law is signed

  37. H.R. 2617, Public Law 117-328, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-117publ328

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Used only for the fiscal 2023 National Cancer Institute line, before he took office.

    official legislative record

    For: Health: cancer research funding

  38. NCI Professional Judgment Budget, President's Budget and Appropriationshttps://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/budget/fact-book/historical-trends/bypass-appropriations

    National Cancer Institute · Reviewed Oct 2, 2026

    The institute's enacted budgets for fiscal 1976 to 2026. Its fiscal 2023 total includes $216,000,000 of Cancer Moonshot funding.

    official office record

    For: Health: cancer research funding

  39. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: hospital first responder fundshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=953s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 15:53.785 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  40. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (H.R. 4366, Public Law 118-42), committee print with explanatory statement (document)

    U.S. House Committee on Appropriations · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The enacted text and explanatory statement. Its project tables are page images with no text layer, so they were OCR'd page by page and every row naming him was read on the page image. Thirteen rows, $26,633,927 in all, on printed pages 232, 285, 481, 518, 742, 930, 978, 1262, 1341 and 1342.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million; Water: projects back home

  41. FY24 Community Project Funding tableshttps://appropriations.house.gov/fiscal-year-2024-community-project-funding

    U.S. House Committee on Appropriations · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The committee's own text tables for each 2024 bill, most marked updated March 6, 2024. They carry the same 13 rows and amounts naming him as the committee print, and are the text the verifier reads.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million; Water: projects back home

  42. Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (H.R. 2882, Public Law 118-47), committee print with explanatory statement (document)

    U.S. House Committee on Appropriations · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The second 2024 package (defense, homeland security, labor and health, and others). An OCR search of all 504 table pages found no row naming him.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  43. Explanatory statement for H.R. 5371, Agriculture, Legislative Branch and Military Construction, 2026https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CREC-2025-11-09/CREC-2025-11-09-pt1-PgS8043-2

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Congressional Record, November 9, 2025, for the act that became Public Law 119-37 on November 12, 2025. One row names him: $340,049 for the Oracle Fire District. The military construction table, printed as text, has no row naming him.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  44. Earmark list for H.R. 6938, Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water; and Interior, 2026https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CREC-2026-01-06/CREC-2026-01-06-pt1-PgH13-3

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Congressional Record, January 6, 2026. H.R. 6938 passed the Senate unchanged and became Public Law 119-74 on January 23, 2026. Six rows name him, $11,199,473 in all: Sahuarita police radios $809,687, Tucson police vehicles $4,200,000, Tombstone water reclamation $989,786, Graham County water line $1,200,000, Marana PFAS treatment $1,750,000 and Marana source water $2,250,000.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million; Water: projects back home

  45. H.R. 6938, 119th Congress, Public Law 119-74https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6938

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Passed the House January 8, 2026 and the Senate without amendment January 15; signed January 23, 2026.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million; Water: projects back home

  46. Explanatory statement for H.R. 7148, community project funding tableshttps://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CREC-2026-01-22/CREC-2026-01-22-pt2-PgH1353-2

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Congressional Record, January 22, 2026; section 4 of Public Law 119-75 gives it effect for divisions A to D. Eight transportation and housing rows name him as House requester, $22,700,000 in all: Bisbee-Douglas airport $2,000,000, Duncan Main Street $1,900,000 (marked House and Senate), Buffalo Soldier Trail $7,000,000, Oro Valley bridge $7,000,000, Frontier Street $1,000,000, Town of Pima $1,000,000, Casa Grande Elementary $1,000,000 and Casa Grande Union High $1,800,000.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  47. Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, Public Law 119-4https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-119publ4

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Fiscal 2025 was funded by this full-year stopgap. Its section 1111 gives the 2024 earmarks no effect, so 2025 carried no new community projects.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  48. Community Project Fundinghttps://ciscomani.house.gov/issues/community-project-funding

    Office of Congressman Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    His House office's page of community project funding disclosures for fiscal 2025 to 2027. These are requests; what was funded is in the explanatory statements.

    official office record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  49. Final FY2024 Agriculture community-project table (document)

    U.S. House Committee on Appropriations · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Final rows name $859,000 for Northern Cochise hospital improvements, Ciscomani and Kelly requesters, and $2 million for Pima’s multipurpose building with Ciscomani as House requester.

    official legislative record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  50. Ciscomani FY2024 community-project purpose memo (document)

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Office memo describes hospital Main Entry/Emergency Department structural upgrades and Pima’s multi-use fire station/community facility. It states intended purpose, not expenditure or completion.

    official office record

    For: Community projects: $60 million

  51. H.R. 4366, 118th Congress, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (Public Law 118-42)https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4366

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Became Public Law 118-42 on March 9, 2024. It carries the fiscal 2024 Energy and Water and Interior acts whose project lists name him.

    official legislative record

    For: Water: projects back home

  52. Ciscomani Secures Wins for District in Annual Defense Authorization Billhttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/ciscomani-secures-wins-district-annual-defense-authorization-bill

    Office of Congressman Juan Ciscomani · Published Dec 12, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    House office press release of December 12, 2025, listing what it says the fiscal 2026 defense bill does for the district.

    official office record

    For: Defense: the 2026 defense bill

  53. H.R. 3838, 119th Congress, the House's fiscal 2026 defense authorization billhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3838

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Passed the House 231 to 196 on September 10, 2025 (Roll Call 262). The final text moved as S. 1071.

    official legislative record

    For: Defense: the 2026 defense bill

  54. Roll Call 262, H.R. 3838, on passagehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025262

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of September 10, 2025, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. He voted Aye.

    official legislative record

    For: Defense: the 2026 defense bill

  55. S. 1071, 119th Congress, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1071

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Passed the House 312 to 112 on December 10, 2025 (Roll Call 320); the Senate agreed December 17. Became Public Law 119-60 on December 18, 2025.

    official legislative record

    For: Defense: the 2026 defense bill

  56. Roll Call 320, S. 1071, on passagehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025320

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of December 10, 2025, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. He voted Yea.

    official legislative record

    For: Defense: the 2026 defense bill

  57. S. 1071, Public Law 119-60, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-119publ60

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Enacted text. Used for sections 1047 (T-37 trainers), 1546 (Army electronic warfare testing) and 2608 (Tucson International Airport land). A search of the full text finds no mention of the Electronic Proving Ground by name.

    official legislative record

    For: Defense: the 2026 defense bill

  58. Rep. Ciscomani Votes to Ban Stock Trading by Members of Congresshttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ciscomani-votes-ban-stock-trading-members-congress

    Office of Congressman Juan Ciscomani · Published Jul 23, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    House office press release of July 23, 2026, with his statement after the House passed H.R. 7008.

    official office record

    For: Ethics: stock trading by members

  59. H.R. 7008, 119th Congress, Stop Insider Trading Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7008

    Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Introduced January 12, 2026. Rep. Bryan Steil is the sponsor; Ciscomani is listed as an original cosponsor. Passed the House July 22, 2026; a Senate cloture vote on taking it up failed 53 to 47 on September 30, 2026.

    official legislative record

    For: Ethics: stock trading by members

  60. H.R. 7008, engrossed in the Househttps://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-119hr7008eh

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The text the House passed. Section 2 sets the stock purchase ban and sale notices; section 3 requires photo identification to vote in federal elections.

    official legislative record

    For: Ethics: stock trading by members

  61. Roll Call 280, H.R. 7008, on passagehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026280

    Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Recorded vote of July 22, 2026, read from the Clerk's roll-call XML. On passage, 232 to 198; he voted Yea.

    official legislative record

    For: Ethics: stock trading by members

  62. Clean Elections debate: water-bill veto votehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=3091s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 4, 2026

    51:31-51:49; Ciscomani describes voting to override a presidential water-bill veto. Paraphrase from the host-matched native captions captured October 4; no independently confirmed exact quotation. Full native payload retained privately.

    candidate statement

    For: Water: presidential veto override vote

  63. H.R. 131: Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/131

    Congress.gov · Published Jan 3, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 4, 2026

    Full 37-action record captured October 4: House voice-vote passage July 21, Senate voice-vote passage December 16, veto December 29, failed House override January 8. No enactment.

    official legislative record

    For: Water: presidential veto override vote; Ciscomani votes to override a water-bill veto

  64. H.R. 131: enrolled Colorado conduit repayment texthttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr131enr/html/BILLS-119hr131enr.htm

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 4, 2026

    Changes repayment terms for the Arkansas Valley Conduit in Colorado, including up to 75 years at reduced simple interest upon demonstrated financial hardship. Enrolled text is not enacted law; the bill was vetoed.

    official legislative record

    For: Water: presidential veto override vote

  65. Clerk: H.R. 131 veto override, Roll Call 9https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/20269

    U.S. House Clerk · Published Jan 8, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 4, 2026

    Ciscomani Yea; 248 Yeas, 177 Nays, one Present and five Not Voting. Two-thirds required; Failed. Thirty-five Republican Yeas. This establishes his vote, not a successful override.

    official legislative record

    For: Water: presidential veto override vote; Ciscomani votes to override a water-bill veto

  66. Clean Elections debate: guest workers and legal pathwayshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2280s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 5, 2026

    Publisher corrected October 5 from the same video’s visible channel and production description. 38:00-39:44 Mendoza; 39:54-41:05 Ciscomani. His own-record assertion begins 40:21. He gives no bill number, so H.R. 4708 is a separately verified related action supporting longer validity, not a certified match to an unnamed intended bill. Paraphrase from this video’s native captions captured October 4; no independently confirmed exact quotation. Full native payload retained privately.

    candidate statement

    For: Guest workers: longer certification and petition periods

  67. September 10 debate: Ciscomani on longer guest-worker permitshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2415s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Own-record window beginning 40:15, within the retained native captions. Paraphrase only; the earlier wider exchange source is retained separately.

    candidate statement

    For: Guest workers: longer certification and petition periods

  68. H.R. 4708, 118th Congress: HIRE Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4708

    Congress.gov · Published Jul 18, 2023 · Reviewed Oct 5, 2026

    Gonzales is the sponsor; Ciscomani is an original July 18, 2023 cosponsor. Complete official records checked October 5: four actions, all introduction or referral on July 18, 2023; 37 cosponsors. No passage or enactment in the 118th Congress. The CRS summary, updated February 28, 2024, describes the agricultural H-2A and nonagricultural H-2B certification and petition provisions.

    official legislative record

    For: Guest workers: longer certification and petition periods; Ciscomani joins a guest-worker validity proposal

  69. HIRE Act: introduced H-2A and H-2B texthttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-118hr4708ih/html/BILLS-118hr4708ih.htm

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Published Jul 18, 2023 · Reviewed Oct 5, 2026

    Section 2 covers three-year employer certifications and petitions in the H-2A and H-2B programs. Section 3 permits interview waivers for status renewals within four years of expiration. Introduced proposal, not law, guaranteed visa issuance or guaranteed reentry.

    official legislative record

    For: Guest workers: longer certification and petition periods; Ciscomani joins a guest-worker validity proposal

  70. Clean Elections debate: Arizona rural health fundinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=967s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 5, 2026

    16:07-16:26, including the $167 million assertion at 16:12. Paraphrase from native captions, with the funding claim kept separate from opponent allegations.

    candidate statement

    For: Rural health: Arizona’s $167 million award

  71. CMS: FY2026 Rural Health Transformation awardshttps://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-announces-50-billion-awards-strengthen-rural-health-all-50-states

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · Published Dec 29, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 5, 2026

    The FY26 state award table gives Arizona $166,988,956. CMS ties the program to Public Law 119-21, distinguishes first-year awards from five-year funding, and explains state-plan review and allocation. Award notice separately verifies cents and recipient.

    official office record

    For: Rural health: Arizona’s $167 million award

  72. Arizona rural health award: February 24 budget revision (document)

    CMS, published by Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System · Published Feb 24, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 5, 2026

    Award RHTCMS332059-01-01, FAIN RHTCMS332059. Page 1 identifies AHCCCS, Section 71401 statutory authority, $166,988,955.92 for budget period December 29, 2025 through October 30, 2026, and performance through October 30, 2030. Page 3 lifts a contractual restriction while retaining reporting duties. The revision obligates $0 in new money; it preserves the existing award, rather than adding a second award.

    official office record

    For: Rural health: Arizona’s $167 million award

  73. Clean Elections debate: VA executive bonuseshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1325s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    22:05.190–22:25.110, with another own-record assertion around 24:08–24:21. Paraphrase from native captions captured October 4; exact words have not been independently authenticated. The full original and surrounding window remain private.

    candidate statement

    For: Veterans: executive bonus oversight

  74. House Veterans’ Affairs: written questions on VA executive incentives (document)

    U.S. House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, published by Government Publishing Office · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    Hearing Serial 118-65. Printed pages 51–52 (PDF pages 55–56) attribute written questions for VA and the inspector general to Ciscomani. Visually checked because the appendix is scanned. This does not establish oral attendance or live questioning. June 4, 2024 is the hearing date; the GPO title page says Washington 2025. An exact publication date is not supplied here.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: executive bonus oversight; Hearing record includes Ciscomani written questions on VA bonuses

  75. H.R. 7319: VA Bonus and Relocation Recovery Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7319

    Congress.gov · Published Feb 2, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    Original cosponsor Ciscomani, February 2, 2026; sponsor Keith Self. Fresh API captures contain all four actions and the single cosponsor with no pagination continuation. Latest action: referral to Oversight and Investigations, March 2, 2026.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: executive bonus oversight; Ciscomani is an original cosponsor of VA recovery proposal

  76. H.R. 7319: introduced texthttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr7319ih/html/BILLS-119hr7319ih.htm

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Published Feb 2, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    Section 2 proposes changes to 38 U.S.C. 721 and 723 for former employees; the 180-day debt-collection rule follows an upheld recoupment order. No veteran allocation or recovered amount is specified.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: executive bonus oversight; Ciscomani is an original cosponsor of VA recovery proposal

  77. Clean Elections debate: Sierra Vista Vet Centerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1272s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    21:12.771–21:33.391. Paraphrase from native captions captured October 4; exact words have not been independently authenticated. Context distinguishes the Sierra Vista assertion from the following secretary-visit claim.

    candidate statement

    For: Veterans: Sierra Vista counseling advocacy

  78. Ciscomani’s letter on Sierra Vista veterans’ counseling (document)

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Published Jul 20, 2023 · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    Both scanned pages visually checked. The signed letter describes a closed Community Access Point at the Warrior Healing Center and an already approved transition to a Vet Center Outstation. It asks VA for answers about service access, the closure and the new site’s timetable.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: Sierra Vista counseling advocacy; Ciscomani asks VA about Sierra Vista counseling closure and replacement

  79. VA announcement of new Vet Centers and outstationshttps://news.va.gov/press-room/va-adds-new-vet-center-and-outstations/

    U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs · Published Dec 1, 2023 · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    Sierra Vista was in the leasing phase with an anticipated 2024 opening. The projection does not establish an actual opening date.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: Sierra Vista counseling advocacy

  80. VA: Sierra Vista Vet Center Outstation statushttps://vetcenter.va.gov/VETCENTER/New_Vet_Centers.asp

    U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs · Reviewed Oct 6, 2026

    Current VA page says services are available in person and virtually Monday through Friday under the Tucson Vet Center, and records an October 2, 2025 community dedication. The dedication date is not treated as the service-opening date.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: Sierra Vista counseling advocacy

  81. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: citizenshiphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=232s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 03:52.532 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Biography: citizenship anniversary

  82. Ciscomani newsletter: citizenship anniversaryhttps://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?c=AZ06JC&id=104653

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    First-person official-office account gives September 18, 2006. It is not a naturalization certificate or court record.

    official office record

    For: Biography: citizenship anniversary

  83. Ciscomani district-week report: naturalization ceremonyhttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/ciscomani-wraps-district-work-week-focused-delivering-results-arizonas-sixth

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Office report describes his account of becoming a citizen twenty years earlier. The year is attributed, not independently adjudicated.

    official office record

    For: Biography: citizenship anniversary

  84. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: bipartisan rankhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=249s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 04:09.449 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Bipartisanship: every-year Arizona ranking

  85. Lugar Center and McCourt School: 2023 House Bipartisan Index (document)

    The Lugar Center and Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Complete published 2023 House table reviewed. Ciscomani ranks 45th with 0.74924, above the other eight Arizona House members. The table is House-only; excluded members are specified in its notes.

    original reporting

    For: Bipartisanship: every-year Arizona ranking

  86. Publisher announcement of the 2023 Bipartisan Indexhttps://www.thelugarcenter.org/newsroom-pressreleases-82.html

    The Lugar Center · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Identifies the released annual House and Senate rankings for Congress in 2023; the two chambers have separate tables.

    original reporting

    For: Bipartisanship: every-year Arizona ranking

  87. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: appropriations memberhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=478s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 07:58.410 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs

  88. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: only dual committeehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1239s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 20:39.637 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs

  89. House Appropriations membershiphttps://appropriations.house.gov/about/membership

    U.S. House Committee on Appropriations · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Complete current committee membership compared with the House Veterans’ Affairs list.

    official office record

    For: Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs

  90. House Veterans’ Affairs membershiphttps://veterans.house.gov/about/members.htm

    U.S. House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Complete current committee membership compared with the House Appropriations list.

    official office record

    For: Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs

  91. Moran’s announced 119th Congress committee assignmentshttps://www.moran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2025/1/sen-moran-appointed-to-influential-committees-for-the-119th-congress

    Office of Senator Jerry Moran · Published Jan 7, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Dated Senate-office announcement includes Senate Appropriations and Senate Veterans’ Affairs. The House and Senate have separate committees.

    official office record

    For: Committee service: Appropriations and Veterans’ Affairs

  92. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: fmap held votehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1065s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 17:45.130 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Medicaid: opposing a proposed matching-rate cut

  93. April 2025 joint House letter on Medicaid coverage (document)

    Offices of the signing U.S. Representatives · Published Apr 14, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Signed joint advocacy letter includes Ciscomani. It documents a stated condition on support, not the full private negotiation sequence.

    official office record

    For: Medicaid: opposing a proposed matching-rate cut

  94. Ciscomani May 2025 negotiation accounthttps://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?c=AZ06JC&id=104280

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    His office reports opposing per-capita caps, provider-tax cuts and FMAP changes in the House negotiation. It is an attributed negotiating account, not proof those changes were all absent from the final law.

    official office record

    For: Medicaid: opposing a proposed matching-rate cut

  95. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: two administrationshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1189s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 19:49.154 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Veterans: work with two administrations

  96. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: va secretary visitshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1286s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 21:26.251 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Veterans: work with two administrations

  97. Ciscomani newsletter: hosting VA Secretary McDonoughhttps://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?c=AZ06JC&id=103110

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    August 2024 office report describes hosting Secretary Denis McDonough at Tucson VA. No exact visit day is supplied here.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: work with two administrations

  98. Ciscomani and VA Secretary Collins: Tucson visithttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/ciscomani-va-secretary-collins-reiterate-support-veterans-during-tucson-visit

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Published Apr 29, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Dated office release documents a Tucson VA visit and veteran-advisory engagement with Secretary Doug Collins; not an independent visitor log.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: work with two administrations

  99. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: va funding every yearhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1252s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 20:52.751 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Veterans: annual VA funding

  100. VA FY2027 Budget in Brief: historical funding table (document)

    U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Printed BiB-3 visually reviewed. FY2023–FY2026 Total VA rises 308.8, 335.2, 401.3 and 453.3 billion dollars; FY2027 is a request and excluded. Aggregate includes mandatory/discretionary funding, collections and RETF, with exclusions and rounding.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: annual VA funding

  101. House roll call 64: FY2024 appropriations concurrencehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202464

    Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives · Published Mar 6, 2024 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Ciscomani Yea on H.Res.1061 concurrence in Senate amendment to H.R.4366 with amendment, 339–85. Corrects unrelated roll reference 70.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: annual VA funding

  102. House roll call 70: FY2025 full-year appropriationshttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202570

    Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives · Published Mar 11, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Ciscomani Yea on H.R.1968 passage, 217–213. Corrects unrelated roll reference 77.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: annual VA funding

  103. House roll call 285: FY2026 appropriations concurrencehttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025285

    Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives · Published Nov 12, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Ciscomani Yea on Senate amendment to H.R.5371, 222–209. Enacted package includes FY2026 VA appropriations.

    official legislative record

    For: Veterans: annual VA funding

  104. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: veterans 8 millionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1303s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 21:43.368 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Veterans: more than $8 million through casework

  105. Ciscomani office: May 2026 veteran casework totalhttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/reps-ciscomani-and-van-orden-introduce-va-home-loan-affordability-act-expand

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Published May 4, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Reports over $7.5 million returned to veterans through casework. Self-reported aggregate, not an audited beneficiary-payment file.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: more than $8 million through casework

  106. Ciscomani office: August 2026 veteran casework totalhttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/ciscomani-honors-local-heroes-fifth-veteran-servant-leader-awards-meets

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Published Aug 27, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Reports over $9 million owed to veteran constituents through VA, IRS, Social Security and other federal agencies. Predates the debate and is not VA-only.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: more than $8 million through casework

  107. Ciscomani first 100 days: separate casework totalshttps://ciscomani.house.gov/media/press-releases/ciscomani-highlights-accomplishments-first-100-days-119th-congress

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Separately reports $8.9 million for all constituents and $3.65 million for veterans, preventing substitution of the whole-office total for a veteran total.

    official office record

    For: Veterans: more than $8 million through casework

  108. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: employmenthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1540s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 25:40.371 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Work before Congress: chamber and governor’s office

  109. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: townhalls office hourshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=1560s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 26:00.024 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Constituent access: town halls and mobile office hours

  110. Ciscomani newsletter: held healthcare telephone town hallhttps://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?c=AZ06JC&id=103021

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Retrospectively describes a healthcare telephone town hall with Julia Strange of Tucson Medical Center and links a recording. It is distinguished from an event announcement.

    official office record

    For: Constituent access: town halls and mobile office hours

  111. Tucson Association of Realtors: August 27 town hall announcementhttps://tucsonportal.ramcoams.net/Meetings/Registration/MeetingDetails.aspx?mid=44603c50-2998-f111-a750-00155d100665

    Tucson Association of Realtors · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Primary event-host listing advertises August 27, 2026 at its conference room. Closed registration does not prove the event occurred.

    original reporting

    For: Constituent access: town halls and mobile office hours

  112. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: intelligence committeeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2239s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 37:19.136 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: National security: committee roles and Mexico intelligence sharing

  113. Ciscomani office: committees and subcommitteeshttps://ciscomani.house.gov/about/committees-and-caucuses

    Office of Representative Juan Ciscomani · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Includes Homeland Security and National Security, Department of State, and Related Agencies appropriations subcommittees.

    official office record

    For: National security: committee roles and Mexico intelligence sharing

  114. Clerk: House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence membershiphttps://clerk.house.gov/committees/IG00

    Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Complete current roster reviewed; it does not list Ciscomani. A roster is not proof that he lacks briefing access or intelligence-related duties.

    official legislative record

    For: National security: committee roles and Mexico intelligence sharing

  115. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: tribal tourism feeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2511s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 41:51.842 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Tribal crossings: a narrow parole-fee proposal

  116. H.R. 5904: tribal ceremonial parole-fee proposalhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5904

    Library of Congress / Congress.gov · Published Nov 4, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Biggs sponsored; Ciscomani original cosponsor November 4, 2025. Complete captured action list contains introduction and Judiciary referral; no passage or enactment.

    official legislative record

    For: Tribal crossings: a narrow parole-fee proposal

  117. H.R. 5904: introduced tribal parole-fee texthttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr5904ih/html/BILLS-119hr5904ih.htm

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Published Nov 4, 2025 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Two-year conditional parole exception for specified tribal/religious ceremonies, cultural exchange or celebrations. It substitutes $200, rather than zero, and requires background screening, tribal written request and cultural-program enrollment. This is a parole charge, not a universal tourism or I-94 fee waiver.

    official legislative record

    For: Tribal crossings: a narrow parole-fee proposal

  118. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: arizona mexico commissionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2637s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 43:57.034 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Trade: Arizona-Mexico Commission leadership

  119. March 2019 USMCA policy review: commission leadership (document)

    Office of the Arizona Governor / Arizona-Mexico Commission · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Page 3 identifies Ciscomani as Arizona-Mexico Commission vice-chair and signs trade-agreement advocacy. Not a measured-growth attribution.

    official office record

    For: Trade: Arizona-Mexico Commission leadership

  120. Archived governor page: Arizona-Mexico Commission directorhttps://azgovernor.gov/governor/files/arizona-week-arizona-mexico-commission-director-juan-ciscomani-talk-mexico

    Office of the Arizona Governor · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    The institutional page title identifies him as director; an exact continuous director/vice-chair title chronology is not reconstructed.

    official office record

    For: Trade: Arizona-Mexico Commission leadership

  121. Arizona-Mexico Commission: present missionhttps://azmc.org/about-us/

    Arizona-Mexico Commission · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Institutional mission covers economic prosperity and quality of life through advocacy, trade, networking and information. A current mission is not his historical job remit.

    official office record

    For: Trade: Arizona-Mexico Commission leadership

  122. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: two year water proposalhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2803s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 46:43.366 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Water: a two-year Colorado River approach

  123. Interior’s 2027–2028 Colorado River operations announcementhttps://www.usbr.gov/newsroom/news-release/5392

    U.S. Department of the Interior / Bureau of Reclamation · Published Aug 21, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Announces two-year operational guidelines within a ten-year decision framework and credits concepts from Upper/Lower Basin and tribal proposals. Does not identify Ciscomani’s causal contribution.

    official office record

    For: Water: a two-year Colorado River approach

  124. Colorado River operating guidelines for 2027 and 2028 (document)

    U.S. Department of the Interior / Bureau of Reclamation · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Final agency action for operating years 2027 and 2028. Lower Basin reductions and state shares depend on implementing agreements; formal section 5.3.C places additional conservation across 2026, 2027 and 2028.

    official office record

    For: Water: a two-year Colorado River approach

  125. AZ-06 Clean Elections debate: mail voting advocacyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSxRgt6zIqo&t=2951s

    Arizona Clean Elections Commission and Arizona Media Association · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Paraphrase from native publisher captions, beginning at 49:11.915 in the original window. The original and surrounding/repeat context were reviewed; no audio-authenticated verbatim quotation is claimed.

    candidate statement

    For: Voting: mail-ballot tracking advocacy

  126. H.R. 5658: Vote by Mail Tracking Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5658

    Library of Congress / Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Ciscomani original cosponsor; House passage November 18, 2024, then Senate referral. Complete 118th Congress action history does not show enactment.

    official legislative record

    For: Voting: mail-ballot tracking advocacy

  127. H.R. 7265: Vote by Mail Tracking Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7265

    Library of Congress / Congress.gov · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Ciscomani original January 27, 2026 cosponsor. Latest captured action is committee order to report an amended bill on February 4; not enacted.

    official legislative record

    For: Voting: mail-ballot tracking advocacy

  128. H.R. 7265: introduced ballot-envelope tracking texthttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr7265ih/html/BILLS-119hr7265ih.htm

    U.S. Government Publishing Office · Published Jan 27, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 7, 2026

    Requires postal tracking barcodes, design/machineability standards and Election Mail logo, with federal write-in absentee exception. Neither a mail-only voting requirement nor enactment.

    official legislative record

    For: Voting: mail-ballot tracking advocacy

  129. 2026 General Election Official Candidate Listhttps://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/az-pimacounty/d2c310c3-ade7-484e-a6f0-1ddaebec0799

    Pima County Elections Department · Published Sep 9, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    The county's official list, stamped updated September 9, 2026 and linked from pima.gov's election page. It prints four District 6 candidates. The Arizona Secretary of State's site refused automated readers (HTTP 403) and was not used.

    official election record

    For: Official candidate list

  130. 2026 General Election Official Write-In Listhttps://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/az-pimacounty/b54c9e42-8520-4201-be8d-10b859da80df

    Pima County Elections Department · Published Sep 11, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Names Michael Dorland (Independent) as the one certified write-in for District 6. Only listed write-in names are counted.

    official election record

    For: Official candidate list

  131. CISCOMANI FOR CONGRESS, Pre-Primary 2026 (document)

    Federal Election Commission · Reviewed Oct 1, 2026

    Principal campaign committee only, covering April 1 to July 1, 2026, received July 9, 2026. The latest report filed by both major campaigns; their October quarterly reports are not due until October 15.

    fec filing

    For: FEC filing snapshot